This week’s
presentation consisted of topics related to Southeast Asian politics such as
Amerasian conflicts, contemporary Vietnamese politics, and economic relationships
between China and Vietnam. I found it
interesting that these three topics were brought up and presented together to
the class because there was no apparent theme that connected them
altogether. Although I found the
political topics interesting, I found that each concept were very different
from one other and lacked greatly in cohesiveness. This led me to be feel that the presentation
was bit confusing and in a sense, incomplete.
I found
Tien’s presentation of Amerasian problems quite intriguing and very
informative. He brought to light the
issues of U.S. governmental involvement with Amerasians from many different
Asian countries. I think it is important
for us to acknowledge all spectrums of the aftermath of the Vietnam War and the
population of Amerasians deals greatly with the war. I think it was a smart motive to see the
political views pertaining to Amerasians because it did not only affect one
ethnic group but many ethnic groups. I
was able to know a glimpse of its importance through Tien’s presentation.
I found
that the topic of contemporary Vietnamese politics to be a very broad concept
to cover. This was clearly evident in
the presentation as well. The article
was very dense and there was way too much to cover through such a short presentation. Along with article being a bit difficult to
take in all at once, the presenter did not make a good job of clearing it up
for the class. The explanation of the
article was very vague and I am still confused about what I am supposed to take
away from it.
I found
that the concept of economic relations between Vietnam and China particularly
interesting. I thought it was a good
idea to tie in economic values within politics.
This presentation allowed us to see one of the conflicting relations of
different ethnicities which in this case, dealt with Vietnam and China. It was interesting to see that China has such
a strong hold on Vietnam through benefits and power.
For the
most part, the presentations were mediocre, but very one note. I wish there was more analysis of the topics
because I felt that most of the presentation composed of background
information. I wish there was more
initiation of discussion and I would have liked to see each person’s opinion
about the topic they were presenting. Also, I would of also have liked to see a more
diverse presentation such as politics from a different related ethnicity other
than Vietnam. I think we got a strong
hold on Vietnamese politics, but it would have been nice to know information
about Cambodia or Laos.
Overall, I
think some topics might be a little too broad and there still needs to be some
fine tuning for a paper. There needs to
be more cohesiveness. Some questions to
think about are: What are some possibly
explanations for the outcome of Vietnamese politics today? How has the
Amerasian population dealt with the acts?
What will happen if Vietnam did not follow through for China
economically?
- Mimi Dao
- Mimi Dao
Good feedback. -Prof. Valverde 4/4
ReplyDelete