We
presented on Lune H. Saechao’s research paper about the resiliency of Iu-Mien
women. I felt like the work was divided evenly. It was really hard to find
scholarly articles about Mien women and I felt like both Shoua and Diana put in
a lot of time to search for these resources because we all came upon the same
ones.
When we
found Saechao’s paper, we thought that it was the closest thing to what we were
doing our research on and decided to use it. Diana read like half of the paper
and skimmed the rest. Shoua also skimmed the article. After I highlighted some
of the things that we wanted to talk about in class, Diana and Shoua both
reread over those parts.
We ended up
splitting parts of the paper to present on. Diana focused on the background
part of the paper while Shoua focused on the findings that the author found.
Because the research and paper were pretty simple, I felt like what they
presented on in class was sufficient because the research paper had a lot of
flaws and limitations that we had mention in class.
I think one
thing that our group could have done better was to probably compare it with an
article or paper that talked about Mien men since it was gender week. We also
could have elaborated and done more research on the traditional roles of Mien
women and men because we did not talk about that in our presentation.
- Pajkub Vahchuama
- Pajkub Vahchuama
No comments:
Post a Comment