Melissa Cheng
995501685
Overall, I thought Week 9’s presentation group did an
amazing job. And I’m not saying this because I’m biased (being that I worked
with them). I think that they all put forth their best effort and really tried
to give us a very full representation of their research paper topics. I think
what I liked most about this presentation was that they were all so different
in approach from each other.
For Trieu’s
presentation, I liked how he gave us a nice background on the history of the
relations between Vietnam
and China . I
think it was a nicely structured powerpoint and I liked how he also enriched
his presentation at the end with a video on the nature of the relations between
China and its
neighboring countries to show that the disdain from Vietnam
to China wasn’t
an isolated incident since China
has also been know to bully other countries. I think it’s all really
interesting because I didn’t know that other countries felt like that about China
prior to taking this course. Either I don’t watch enough news or perhaps there
isn’t really substantial reporting in American news on the topic. Either way, I
appreciated what I’ve learned in lecture and I felt Trieu’s presentation
enhanced this new perspective I didn’t have earlier.
Linda’s presentation, I thought was really informational and
I was very impressed by her comprehensiveness in terms of her spoken portion of
her presentation. I thought she connected ideas really well and also brought up
points that I thought were actually pretty interesting. I liked how she
integrated her ongoing thoughts throughout her data collection and analysis
into her presentation because it helped me think more about my own research
paper in how I should process things. For example, when she mentioned how there
was a person who filled out the survey who was identified as Vietnamese but was
in fact ethnically Chinese and nationally American it made me think, how should
one go about processing that information. Should you include it? Should you
disregard it? Would this be considered invalid to the research? I just thought
that was very intriguing. I also liked how she showed us the thorough breakdown
of all her research and how she shared her personal experiences with Paris
by Night and the bond she attempted to create with her family through this
media. I especially liked how she shared with class some quotes from her
interviewees on their experiences with Paris
by Night because it gave us some perspective that went beyond static numbers so
in a sense it allowed us to get something more out of it than statistical data
from a group of people.
I also really liked Justin’s presentation on “A look into
Vietnamese Cinema and its Transcultural Consumption. I thought all the theories
he introduced were a nice background in order to get the class to understand more
about what he would be discussing throughout the presentation. I really liked
how he went into dissecting the transcultural consumption of the film itself.
He discussed how it went over the government of Vietnam
through Fortissimo Films which bought the rights to the film and screened it
elsewhere. He told us how it went through the government when it was screened
in Vietnam and
how it went under it through illegal means like youtube with a full uncut
version that featured the men kissing each other. I also liked how he talked about the two
different perspectives of people who saw the uncut vs cut film. I thought that
was an interesting idea that people were consuming different movies because of
censorship.
Overall, I think the presentations were great and I guess my
questions to the group would be, (for Trieu) “Do you think that if roles were
reversed and Vietnam
was in economic power that China
would hate Vietnam ?” (for Linda) “Do you think that Paris
by Night unconsciously shapes the political opinions of the 2nd
generation in a negative way or does it not really make a difference?” (for Justin) “Do you think that Vietnam
will be more open to screening uncut gay films any time in the next decade?”
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGood feedback for your peers. You have interesting research but it seems you're using secondary sources. What is your original research? Are all your assumptions based on other's research? That was not clear in your powerpoint. Also, youtube vids had very little to do directly with your research. -Professor Valverde 4/4
ReplyDelete