First off, the topic that this group chose is really
interesting. Personally, it is a
topic that I really want to get a better understanding of. As a Hmong women, I was taught by my
grandparents that the Mien and Hmong are really similar because both groups
resided together in some villages and both did not have a country of their
own. So I grew up thinking that
both of the Hmongs and Miens were always marginalized because we didn’t have a
country. My kindergarten and first
grade years, I learned more about the Mien culture in school during Mien New
Year. But even then, all I knew
were the happy things that seemed to be the same as Chinese New Year. However, once I went to highschool, I
stopped hearing about Mien people and grew more political awareness of the
Hmong. Coming to Davis, I realized
that my whole awareness of the Mien completely faded from me because I was too
focused in my Hmong culture.
Despite the animosity that some Hmong people have pointed out between
the Hmong and Mien, I still believe it is important for me to learn about the
Mien and understand why they remain to be marginalized.
What I noticed that this group did really
well in was critiquing the article’s research method. The fact that these ladies noticed the small sample size
that the researcher used demonstrates that they understand the lack of
applicability to other lu-Mien women.
Also, this group dived straight into important points in the articles
that should brought to attention.
They didn’t waste time talking about the whole article which would have
been a waste of time.
Some
suggestions that I have for future research or their research paper are the
improvement of article’s research, personal opinions or accounts (their own
research), and other factors that should be taken into consideration to improve
the researches so far. One of the problems that I had with the presentation was
that it lacked some personal accounts and research. I understand that with such a small amount of time, there
probably was not enough time for this group to conduct enough research, but if
they had done at least some, it would be interesting if they brought up the
researches that they had so far.
The survey questions that they mentioned which they sent to the
professor would have been important in demonstrating some the improvements that
they would have made from the article’s research. If they already have
these research questions, it would have been great if they had emailed it to student
organizations on campus that can forward it to Mien organizations in Sacramento
area. So this is an important
suggestion that this group can use to help them with their research. Now, going back to my point earlier
about the group’s personal opinions or accounts, it would have been interesting
if some of the group members talked to some of the students in class and ask if
they had any insight in the lu-Mien women. I know for sure that I don’t have much understanding about
lu-Mien women, but I have had several lu-Mien female school friends, who I
still keep in contact with, and maybe my opinions about them would have
indicated whether the article’s research is applicable to them or not.
Now
as I mentioned earlier about my goal to understand why the Mien remain
marginalized, I think this is an important factor that the group should take
into account. The fact that the
ethnic group to be marginalized already and then to also have the Mien women
marginalized in their own marginalized ethnicity, it just makes me wonder how is
their culture and ethnicity still surviving? What is still keeping this ethnic
group alive?
Fail, I didn't even tag my name to my post. Here it is...
ReplyDelete-Brenda Vue
Excellent insight and helpful feedback. Hope you accomplish your goal to learn more about the Mien culture and people. -Prof. Valverde
ReplyDelete