Linda Phan
May 23, 2012
ASA 150E
Week
8 Reflection
I thought
both presentations on Hmong were well done. The first presentation focused on
Shaminism while the second one focused on Hmong children and family relations.
The first presentation had a great example when they used the video clip from
the popular TV series “House.” I thought that this was a particularly good idea
because House is one of the very mainstream TV series that focuses on medicine.
This episode was essentially a clash between Eastern and Western medicine. In the
beginning of the episode, there is a spirit that attempts to claim the child by
choking him and taking over his body. To Hmong people, this is interpreted as a
spirit possessing the child but to the West, this is simply dismissed as a bad
dream followed by a series of unexplainable symptoms that will eventually go,
or not go, away. While the Western doctors in this episode again and again
refused to believe in the potential of a Shaman’s power, the certainly could
not deny it. By the end of the episode, the child had been cured of his ailment
but there is a mystic tone which suggests that we still cannot be certain if
the western medicine or Shaman had cured the child. This episode can be
extended to a power struggle between Southeast Asian traditions and values in
American mainstream culture and how White Supremacy tends to dismiss traditions
and values that do not have Anglo origins.
I also
thought the video with interviews asking Hmong people what Shaminism is was
also a good idea. Since many documentaries and interviews watched in class are several
years old, it is very refreshing to be able to watch a series of interviews
that not only interview Hmong students at UC Davis, but local community members
in the Sacramento area as well—an area that has a predominantly large Hmong
population. This video also highlighted the importance in maintaining tradition
and religion because the defining a specific religion is very difficult as it
can be very broad or there may be different aspects and versions depending on
who practices it and from what region they came from. The only things that I feel
these presenters can improve on is making sure they finish according to the
specific time frame that they were intended as to not take away from other’s
presentations or need to cut their presentation short. I also would recommend
that the presentation be more interactive as while the visual parts of the
presentation, the lecture about Shaminism was quite dull since it was a lot of
information to take it and little room to process it.
The
second presentation was understandably rushed since the presenters were given
less time than they had anticipated. Given the time constraints, I thought the presentation
as very thorough and interesting. The
two powerpoint slides that particularly stood out to me were the ones about
Pokemon and The Fairy Odd Parents. I thought it was a good idea to take media
examples that that most of the audience were familiar with and analyzed them in
the context of the presenter’s topic. While the presentation was still lecture
style, the connections that the audience made with the examples provided made
the presentation more interesting, therefore more intriguing and even engaging
as it provided an avenue for the audience to rethink about the messages that
the mainstream American media are conveying, specifically to children.
Good observations and feedback. -Prof. Valverde 4/4
ReplyDelete