This week’s readings focused on gender roles and to be
honest I preferred the readings from this week the most so far. I think that it
was interesting to learn about the Iu-Mien and their culture since I have never
come across it academically or otherwise. However, I think that the Iu-Mien
article represented very familiar themes of gender inequality and expectations
of women in a patriarchal society in relation to Asian culture. I guess after
awhile, these themes of violence, oppression, subservience and resilience are
no longer shocking or novel which I feel isn’t a positive situation.
The study done by Saechao focused on studying the Mien women
and their lived experiences as well as resettlement difficulties. It points out
an interesting and obvious after-the-fact perspective of how refugee
resettlement is much different than immigrant resettlement because refugees are
actually forced out of their country and are unprepared for the “new
environment” in contrast to those that immigrate and are actually trying to
leave their country and are mentally prepared. The majority that comes to the United
States have assimilation issues due to
language barriers, discrimination and struggles with balance of power in the
family. I think it’s very common that in America
children talk back to their parents and that Asian parents struggle with trying
to have complete control over their child because it’s so engrained in their
culture and it’s seen as an absolute horrible situation when the child is
defiant as noted in the article by Saechao. With the Mien women, they are
expected to bear the burden of birthing and rearing of children, household
duties, obeying the males and somehow still have to work to fit in or
assimilate into their new environment.
I think today’s presentation on the Saechao article was ok.
I felt that the speakers tried to convey the struggles of the women and the
difficulty overall of the assimilation for these women. I believe they touched
on points about domestic violence and oppression and gender roles and how they
relate to the Mien culture. I think at least their presentation was cohesive
and they tried to present the study as clearly as possible on their Powerpoint
slides and I appreciated that. Although when I did read the article I felt that
the presentation did not give it a fair representation of it but when I
realized the article was nearly 100 pages long and we obviously didn’t have
enough time to comprehensively discuss everything in the article I understood
why it was so focused on certain aspects of the article.
Melissa Cheng
Good. -Prof. Valverde 4/4
ReplyDelete